|
Home Index |
|
Home Index |
New WorldCreated 2006/03/17, modified 2010/04/24 |
|
|
I have previously written about the oil supply running out, mainly in terms of what oil is likely to be substituted with, and greenhouse/climate change.
Getting properly started on this page has been more difficult than most of
the Net pages I have written. While I have very little doubt that society
will be greatly effected by such things as those listed above, I find it
very difficult to imagine the detail of the changes we will face.
What is likely to happen as the oil runs out?
Steeply rising oil prices will cause unprecedented impact on the global economy. Modern agriculture, transport, and mining are greatly dependent on cheap oil. They are also some of the major greenhouse gas producers; so one of the early effects of declining oil will be at least a temporary decline in the amount of greenhouse gasses going into the atmosphere. Liquid and gaseous fuels can be made from coal, shale oil and tar sands (see the box on the right). All these fuels produce even more greenhouse CO2 per unit of energy obtained than does conventional petroleum. Liquid fuels cannot be made from coal, oil shale, or tar sands if climate change is to be limited; it's as simple as that. Greed and short-term profits are stronger movers of industry and government than long-term sustainability and our environment, but there is another factor involved, Energy Return On Investment (EROI) (see the box on the right); the ratio for free-flowing petroleum has been around 30:1, that for tar sands is much closer to 2:1. It may well be that the extraction of liquid fuel from tar sands will be found to be uneconomical. So, what will happen as oil prices rise and airlines have to increase their ticket prices, long distant trucking becomes uneconomical, and international shipping costs go through the roof? In the early stages we will probably see:
The present globalised food production and distribution will collapse as the oil runs out, we will develop more self-sustainable communities. |
|
Home Top Index |
More expensive petroleum will result, in the short term, in decreased
fossil fuel burned and consequent reduction in greenhouse carbon dioxide
released into the atmosphere. Not only will there be a direct feedback, eg.
people will use their cars less as the fuel price rises, but there will be
multiplying effects, for example:-
It seems to me likely that these accumulating effects will cause major upsets to the global economy, with probably deep economic depression. In time people will look to unconventional petroleum sources as a source of energy. Many of these are more greenhouse polluting than petroleum; so the loss of petroleum will not necessarily result in less greenhouse carbon dioxide being produced in the long term. |
|
Home Top Index |
|
What if the price of fuel rises significantly in an area where the water
supply is already heavily committed and where rainfall is declining because
of climate change?
Access to groundwater, which would reduce the reliance on rain, will be
reduced because of increased pumping costs; the same would apply to
water from desalination.
Compounding of effects such as this will happen in some places and will be much worse for the inhabitants of those places than one effect alone. |
|
Modern cities have largely been designed to suite the motor car and cheap
liquid fuel. There are
wide multilaned roads, shops are out of walking range of housing, their
viability depends on the cheap transport of goods and materials into cities
from a large surrounding rural area.
This is all going to change. As energy-efficient public transport replaces private cars (usually transporting only one person at a time) the need for multi-lane roads will greatly diminish; the need for paths suitable for cycling and walking will increase. As private cars become too expensive to fuel there will be an increased demand for old-style corner delis and local supermarkets within walking or cycling distance rather than huge shopping centres within driving distance. As the cost of transport increases I suspect that smaller regional cities will become more viable than larger cities. Electric rail will become very important as a way of moving goods into cities. As the price of food rises there will be a trend back toward the vegetable garden in the back yard. How will this effect those houses that have been built on such small blocks that they have no significant back yards? I suspect that, again, larger cities will go into decline and smaller cities where land is more affordable will prosper. What will happen to the large areas of deserted housing that may develop in big cities? |
|
Home Top Index |
|
Recessions and depressions caused by economic downturns following unaffordable
fuel prices seem very likely. I suspect that people will quickly discover
that they can do without many non-essentials; this will result in the loss
of jobs, especially in cities.
On the other hand, with the use of machinery being minimised everywhere (and on farms and market gardens in particular) because of the costs of running it, there will be a greatly increased demand for labour, especially outside of the cities. |
|
Large centralised industries will, in at least some cases, tend to be replaced
by smaller decentralised industries.
For example, at present wheat is carted long distances to large flour mills, from there the flour goes to large centralised bakeries, the bread is carted to large shopping centres, and finally people drive their cars to buy their bread. There is much more use of transport involved in this system than there needs to be. Smaller flour mills could be placed closer to where the wheat is grown, smaller bakeries could be spread around, and smaller shops closer to where people are living. |
| If a powerful nation is in trouble because of declining access to petroleum will it be able to resist taking petroleum from a weaker neighbour by force? Consider the Iraq War. |
|
Home Top |